Essential Information on an Essential Issue
18 May, 2001
Our regular Statistics That Matter feature based on the Household Labour Force Survey figures for the March 2001 quarter.
- LABOUR MARKET WAIT-AND-SEE
New Zealand's unemployment figures have fallen to a 13-year low of 5.4%, largely
attributable to a small decrease in labour market participation. Statistics NZ reports that labour
market conditions are essentially unchanged from the previous quarter. Economic commentators
are describing the business climate as "wait-and-see", in the light of the slowing US and
Australian economies. Our regular Statistics That
Matter summary of the employment statistics is
included in this issue. Some highlights:
The 5.4%official unemployment rate is the lowest it has been since June 1988. This is a
drop of 1% from March last year and a 0.2% improvement on last quarter's figures.
The drop means there were 3,000 fewer people registered as unemployed. It doesn't
appear that these people necessarily moved into jobs, however, as the number of people in
employment has remained the same over the last quarter. The indication is that these people left the
There was a shift to full-time employment with 11,000 more people working full-time
and 10,000 fewer people working part-time.
Despite the static employment growth this quarter, the number of people in employment
grew 2.3% (or by 41,000 new jobs) over the last year.
There are now 12.0% Maori unemployed, down from 13.0% last quarter. The Pacific
Island rate is down to 11.2% from 11.4%. The European/Pakeha rate went up to 4.2% from 4.0%.
Young people 1619yrs continue to be the worst affected by unemployment with 16.9%
out of work.
- ANZ chief economist Bernard Hodgett predicts that unemployment will remain the
same over the coming year. He says that a major factor is the low rate of growth in the working
age population which grew by only 22,000 over the last year, well down from the growth of up
to 60,000 a year during the 1990s. He says the economy only needs to generate 25,000 jobs
per year to satisfy the labour market and hold unemployment at the present rate.
- The working age population figure is particularly affected by emigration. Emigration
from New Zealand is running at a ten-year high with a net loss in the last year of about 20,000
people. Australia remains the prime attraction for migrants a net 5,000 people left for Australia in
the March quarter alone. But National Bank economist Cameron Bagrie says that we may stem
this so-called "brain drain" now that NZ's unemployment figures are lower than most OECD
countries. He believes that the new policy of limiting NZ'ers eligibility for the dole in Australia
will keep more people here, while the bursting of the "international IT bubble" will keep others
from chasing high-paying jobs overseas.
Source Statistics New Zealand 10 May 2001 Household labour Force Survey; The Dominion 9 May 2001 Job figures
could increase rate cut James Weir; The Dominion 10 May 2001 Wages rise may prevent big cut in interest rate James Weir;
Press Release 10 May 2001 Act Party Time to review measurement of unemployment; NZ Herald 11 May 2001 Jobless rate hits
13-year low Brian Fallow; The Daily News 11 May 2001 NZ jobless figures may spell end to brain drain to Aussie
Simon Louisson; The Dominion 11 May 2001 Job figures spur call for big rate cut James Weir; The Dominion 11 May 2001
Unemployment at 13-year low James Weir; INL Newspapers Website Bay of Plenty 11 May 2001 Unemployment hits 13-year
low but job ads drop; Press Release Deutsche Bank 11 May 2001 ANZ job ads April 2001 Darren Gibbs;
- OZ AND US JOB DOWNTURNS
Our jobless rate remains lower that most countries in Europe and almost as low as
Britain. Across the Tasman, firms have laid off more than 40,000 people in April, pushing up the
Australian unemployment rate to 6.8%.
Meanwhile, American businesses shed 223,000 jobs in April pushing the US
unemployment figure up to 4.5%. The "help-supply", or temporary workers, have taken the brunt of the
job losses with 108,000 lay-offs. The manufacturing sector also lost 104,000 jobs, but this is
only slightly more than the 93,000 jobs per month this sector has been losing since early 1998.
The big change is that there has been no increase in jobs in the service sector, which had
previously been balancing the losses in manufacturing.
Job losses in the US information technology sector are severe as many companies continue
to announce redundancies. In the last four months, these have included: Cisco 8,000;
Compaq 5,000; Dell 4,000; Ericsson 12,000; Hewlett-Packard 3,000; Intel 5,000; JDS Uniphase
5,000; Kodak 3,500; Lucent 16,000; Motorola 22,000; Nortel Networks 5,000; Philips 7,000; and
Texas Instruments 2,000.
Source The Dominion 7 May 2001 Big US job losses fuel fears of recession Reuters; The Dominion 23 April 2001 NC
axes jobs; The Independent 18 April 2001 Yahoo fires 420; The Independent 18 April 2001 Giant chops jobs; Weekend Herald
21-22 April More profit warnings and cutbacks Independent; Sunday Star Times 29 April 2001 "IT sector fears slump will worsen"
- Liam Dann; NZ Herald 9 May 2001 Dell gets its job axe out again Reuters; The Daily News 11 May 2001 NZ jobless
figures may spell end to brain drain Simon Louisson;
- VOICES:ON THE LATEST STATISTICS
" Today we saw the trough in the unemployment rate."
Stephen Topliss, BNZ Bank economist
" The figures are consistent with an economy in wait-and-see mode. Growth is happening but
it is pretty moderate. Firms are waiting to see how bad the slowdown in the United States
and Australia will be, and how commodity prices hold up..."
Anthony Byett, ASB Bank economist
"All the signs point to unemployment continuing to reduce over the long term. There is no
room for complacency. There have been reductions in unemployment amongst Maori and
Pacific peoples but the rate still remains too high.
" Regional employment growth also remains patchy. The government is right to be focussing
on regional economic development to ensure that New Zealanders living in the towns, as well as
the cities, benefit from a growing economy and the security of paid employment..."
Steve Maharey, Minister of Social Services and Employment
" The Household Labour Force Survey results are becoming increasingly divorced from
reality because the survey methodology has not kept up with changing trends. The latest HLFS
survey would have us believe there were just 104,000 people unemployed in the March quarter. Yet
in March, official government figures show that nearly 143,000 people were on the dole.
Clearly this figure makes a nonsense of the HLFS survey result.
" The HLFS survey was applied here at a time when there was virtually no such thing as
inter-generational unemployment. It simply does not measure people who have long ago
resigned themselves to not looking for work and languishing on the dole..."
" The `official' measure has become so disparate with reality that the Australian chief
statistician now wants anybody who has worked less than 10 hours in a week recognised as
unemployed. Adoption of this here would more than double our rate of unemployment as measured by
the HLFS and provide a much truer picture. I believe it is high time our Government
Statistician considered supporting this stance."
Muriel Newman, Act Party Employment Spokesperson
- COMMUNITY SERVICES CARD
With the recent cost-of-living rise for beneficiaries, the government has raised the
threshold of eligibility for the Community Services Card so that 1,270 superannuitants and 40
beneficiaries will still qualify for the health care subsidies. However, the new thresholds now mean
that 48,000 workers who earn less than these beneficiaries are
ineligible for the card.
PM Helen Clark has criticised her Ministers and their departments for not informing her of
this anomaly and not mentioning that all beneficiaries qualify for the cards automatically
anyway. However, she has since pointed out that no one is worse
off and she will not change her mind and include low-income workers in the scheme.
Community Services Cards were introduced in 1992. They entitle the holder to subsidies
for doctors' visits of $15 for adults and $20 for children and subsidised prescriptions. There
are approximately one million Community Services Cards in circulation and between 25% and
30% are held by people not on benefits. The eligibility threshold for cards for single beneficiaries
is now $19,100 but the threshold for workers is $18,500.
- The government dismissed opposition claims that low-income workers were being
encouraged to quit their jobs, go on the dole and receive subsidised health care. However, it seems
the bottom line for this government is that the year's Budget is already over-spent and it is
unwilling to put up the $14 million more dollars it would take to include the low-income workers.
Minister of Health Annette King considers the Community Services Card a "blunt instrument" for
providing low-income earners access to health care and said it would be replaced soon, anyway.
"Soon" turns out to be the 2002-03 financial year.
- Green MP Sue Bradford has called for the immediate scrapping of the Community
Services Card. Bradford argues that health care should be provided as a right of
citizenship and not just targeted at low-income earners. However, Bradford says her party was unable to
convince the government to include the low-income workers in the interim. Bradford: "I'm really upset
but the Greens are not about to bring down the government over this issue when the alternative
a National-Act coalition has a disastrous track record in its treatment of beneficiaries and
low income workers."
VOICES: ON THE COMMUNITY SERVICES CARD:
"It is unfair and wrong for the government to say to two poor people on exactly the same
income that one will get help and one will not, on a totally arbitrary basis."
Jenny Shipley, National Party Leader
"The government is sending a signal to 48,000 people who are in work that they'd be better
off on a benefit."
Richard Prebble, Act Party Leader
"We're not cutting anything out for people who have got something now. What we are not
going to do is to lift it to take in a whole lot of other people when we'd rather look at the
community service card itself."
Annette King, Minister of Health
"Every time a new threshold is set, another group will lose out. The only way to overcome
this inherent unequity of targeted benefits is to move to universality."
Sue Bradford, Green MP
Source NZ Herald 27 April 2001 "Clark puts card woes down to bad advice" Audrey Young; The Daily News 24 April
2001 "Lift in income level for community cards"- Nick Venter; The Dominion 24 April 2001 "New health rules hard on
workers"- Nick Venter; NZ Herald 24 April 2001 "Workers miss out on cheap healthcare" by Francesca Mold; NZ Herald 25 April
2001 "Govt won't budge on card users" by Francesca Mold; The Dominion 27 April 2001 "Springing the poverty trap -
editorial"; The Dominion 27 April 2001 "Failing to keep the bastards honest" - Chris Trotter; NZ Herald 26 April 2001 "Card
increase adds to the poverty trap" - editorial; The Dominion 28 April 2001 "Maharey backs his officials over card gaffe" -
Tracy Watkins; NZ Herald 26 April 2001 "Greens seek turnaround on card decision" - Vernon Small; Sunday Star Times 29 April
2001 "National criticises card fiasco" - Kim Newth; NZ Herald 1 May 2001 "PM tells sidekicks to sharpen up" Francesca Mold;
The Dominion 30 April 2001 "Cards fiasco a public relation disaster for the Government " Nick Venter; Press release
NZ government 26 April 2001 "Community Card Changes Only Affect Superannuitants"; Press release National Party 27
April 2001 "Cabinet's cruel card trick"; Press release Green Party 26 April 2001 "Scrapping Community Card Only Way to
Equity"; Press release Act Party 27 April 2001 ACT "Will Fight Moves to Abolish Community Card"; Sunday Star Times 6 May
2001 "Clark reluctant to pull the red card over bungle" Guyon Espiner.
- NEW MINISTRY A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE
The amalgamation of Winz and the Ministry of Social Policy has been criticised for
its haste, but New Zealand Herald columnist Colin James argues that it is not just an
elaborate strategy to dump the present Winz CEO Christine Rankin. He describes the new Ministry
of Social Development as the forerunner of a fundamental change to the NZ public service.
James: "The merger is being done in the context of a strategy for the state sector as a whole. The move
is more remarkable for having been done without or with minimal advice from officials. It
is major policymaking by amateurs, namely politicians."
Colin James describes the new Ministry as the "social" equivalent of the Treasury testing
all policy against social criteria the way the Treasury does against fiscal and economic criteria.
The new Ministry will also act as a balance to Jim Anderton's Ministry of Economic Development.
These changes should be seen in the light of the state sector reforms of 1988 which
separated policy advice from the government's delivery and regulatory services. This seperation was
intended to sharpen managers' focus, provide efficiencies and improve effectiveness. While
this was generally considered successful, the side effect is that NZ now has 39 departments
operating independently on behalf of their particular goals. What the government is now attempting to do
is to get a cohesive body of departments who compliment each other. The new Ministry of
Social Development will give the government a clearer view of the actual effects of its policies.
The jargon in Wellington describes this as a "whole-of-government" or "joined-up
- The job description for the CEO of the new Ministry is being described as a person
who can "
think strategically and analytically about the government's roles in relation to
social policies and the delivery of services". This extraordinary individual "must demonstrate
the analytical and conceptual skills to lead and advance debate" on social wellbeing, policy
responses and auditing social policy generally, and to "lead production of timely,
innovative, relevant and intellectually rigorous policy advice integrating the broad range of social policies..."
Colin James: "It is almost certain that the government will not pay enough to get this
intellectual and managerial Hercules. As a useful adjunct, Ms Rankin's capabilities fall far short ..."
Source NZ Herald 24 April 2001 "Forget Rankin, superministry is the real story" Colin James
- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GUIDE
A guide to how local authorities can get more involved in economic development
activities has been published by Local Government New Zealand.
"Unleashing the Economic Development Potential of our
Communities" is specifically aimed at elected representatives and staff
at local government level, and it argues for councils being more involved in economic
development activities. The guide has been written by Mark Goodchild, Sarah Russell and Kel Sanderson
of Business & Economic Research Ltd (BERL).
In the guide, Dunedin Mayor Sukhi Turner (who is chair of the Economic Development
Working Party) describes an "explosion of interest" by central government over the past year in the
concepts of local economic development. She says that this has, in turn, inspired many of
local authorities to review their efforts, or, if the council's active involvement was negligible, to
now get involved.
Turner: "It is our job as the leaders of our communities to be pro-active and acknowledge
our essential role in the local economic development process. There is more to economic
development than just understanding, or being aware of the principles. It is also about putting
these principles into action and about our councils committing resources for the long-term to
develop sound strategies and effective initiatives. The regional statistics show that many parts of
the country are still very undeveloped and that our national economy is much poorer for this.
This shows there is still a lot of work for us all to do to grow our local economies..."
The Guidebook can be downloaded from the Local Government New Zealand website at
the full report.
Top of Page
This Letter's Main Page
The Jobs Letter Home Page |
The Website Home Page
The Jobs Research Trust -- a not-for-profit Charitable Trust
constituted in 1994
We publish The Jobs Letter